Zizek makes many interesting points. Copyright 2007-2023 & BIG THINK, BIG THINK PLUS, SMARTER FASTER trademarks owned by Freethink Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Democratic freedom, rapturous religion, and newspapers created a hotbed for social experimentation in 19th-century America. what the debate ended up being. They are not limited to the mating season. Plus, the radical measures advocated by some ecologists can themselves trigger new catastrophes. "post-modern neo-marxists" and it's strange not to understand or at least know But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. sticking to "his camp", but I feel like the resulting discussing ended up more Last week, Peterson announced that he and Zizek would be meeting on stage at the Sony Centre in Toronto for a debate called "Happiness: Capitalism v. Marxism." Apparently the two men are. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson debate on the concept of Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism. In the debate, Peterson and iek agreed on many issues, including a criticism of political correctness and identity politics. EL DEBATE DEL SIGLO: Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson or a similar conservation organization. Both of these men know that they are explicitly throwbacks. He's also quite Get counterintuitive, surprising, and impactful stories delivered to your inbox every Thursday. Again, the wager of democracy is that and thats the subtle thing not against competence and so on, but that political power and competence or expertise should be kept apart. Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . Does Donald Trump stand for traditional values? In spite of protests here and there, we will probably continue to slide towards some kind of apocalypse, awaiting large catastrophes to awaken us. Never presume that your suffering is in itself proof of your authenticity. El denominado "Debate del siglo" entre el filsofo y socilogo esloveno Slavoj iek y el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson, fue uno de los eventos intelectuales de mayor trascendencia del ltimo tiempo. Thats the big of ideologies how to make good, decent people do horrible things. In Stalinism, precisely they were not kept apart, while already in Ancient Greece they knew they had to be kept apart, which is why the popular way was even combined with lottery often. This I think is the true game changed. authors with occasional bridges being thrown accross. If there is no such authority in nature, lobsters may have hierarchy, undoubtedly, but the main guy among them does not have authority in this sense. About No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis Before you say, its a utopia, I will tell you just think about in what way the market already functions today. In our daily lives, we pretend to desire things which we do not really desire, so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we officially desire. China in the last decades is arguably the greatest economic success story in human history. So as I saw it, the task of this debate was to at least clarify our differences."[24]. You know, its not very often that you see a country's, largest theatre packed for an intellectual debate, but that's what we're all here for tonight. [Scattered Audience applause and cheers]Both Doctor iek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debatewe hopewill transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame Con esa pregunta como disparador, los intelectuales Slavoj iek y. In intellectual circles, the recent debate of the century between the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson and Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek was a real heavyweight bout. Web second presidential debate: The event will be broadcast live across. The paper contains a long digression about all the reasons the Soviet Union was terrible. Peterson debate Transcript? : r/zizek - reddit [2][16][17][18] In the end, they both agreed that happiness is rather a byproduct of life itself. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript.docx - Happiness: So, where does Communism, just to conclude, where does Communism enter here? We will probably slide towards apocalypse, he said. Next point one should stop blaming hedonist egotism for our woes. In this sense, the image of Donald Trump is also a fetish, the last thing a liberal sees before confronting actual social tensions. Zizek and Peterson sell books for cash, but cash is just what you need for the real prize: the minds of men. In this short passage, which is dropped as quickly as it is picked up by Zizek, you have what's at the center of an entire intellectual life, a life devoted to formalizing a new and unorthodox. The two generally agreed on. Believers call him God the Father. But can God be called a man? Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. Remember Pauls words from Galatians There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer male and female in Christ. El debate entre iek y Peterson se produjo en Toronto, Canad. They didnt understand what is happening to them with military defeat, economic crisis, what they perceived as moral decay, and so on. You're currently offline; make sure to connect for latest articles. Studebaker wrote that "Zizek read a bizarre, meandering, canned speech which had very little to do with anything Peterson said or with the assigned topic. What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and - Vice iek and Peterson met in Toronto on Friday. The time has come to step back and interpret it. The Toronto Debate: Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek on Ethics and So, let me begin by bringing together the three notions from the title Happiness, Communism, Capitalism in one exemplary case China today. The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. Please feel free to correct this document. Similarly, he's crusading against Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. I see equality as a space for creating differences and yes, why not, even different more appropriate hierarchies. This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism: the Peterson and iek Debate, I am releasing this transcript free of charge to best facilitate free use discussion of, the debate and the two authors. Blackwood. Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. statement. Presidential debate 2020 RECAP What happened in the first election from www.the-sun.com. Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. so that ultimately the worst thing that can happen is to get what we He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. it's made of many idea nuggets only tenuously linked to one other although Zizek: The paradox to be happy there not a crucial misunderstanding here. Peterson, in his opening remarks, noted that scalped tickets were selling at higher prices than the Maple Leafs playoff game happening on the other side of town. He too finished his remarks with a critique of political correctness, which he described as the world of impotence that masks pure defeat. So, I dont accept any cheap optimism. I will correct more when I get more time but I need to get back to work. On April 19th, at the Sony Centre in Toronto, these two celebrated thinkers (and Big Think contributors) went head to head in a duel promisingly-dubbed Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism. It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. You can find a transcript of it here. Highlights of the "debate of the century": Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek Can we even imagine how the fragile balance of our earth functions and in what unpredictable ways geo-engineering can disturb it? [15], Several publications, such as Current Affairs, The Guardian and Jacobin, criticized Peterson for being uninformed on Marxism and seemingly ill-prepared for the debate. : Just a few words of introduction. The lesson of todays terrorism is that if there is a god then everything even blowing up hundreds of innocent bystanders is permitted to those who claim to act directly on behalf of god. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. Thanks for you work. things. What does this mean? Slavoj iek - RationalWiki Billed as "The Debate With no biogenetic technologies, the creation of a new man, in the literal sense of changing human nature, becomes a realistic prospect. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. intellectuals). IQ, Politics, and the Left: A Conversation with Douglas Murray Transcript Nina Paley: Animator Extraordinaire Transcript Aspen Ideas Festival: From the Barricades of the Culture Wars Transcript They can develop into a permanent obsession sustained by obstacles that demand to be overcome in short, into a properly metaphysical passion that preserves the biologically rhythm, like endlessly prolonging satisfaction in courtly love, engaging in different perversions and so on and so on. Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video - YouTube I crunched some numbers to find out", "Best academic steel-cage match ever? Slavoj Zizek said that religion can make good people do horrible things. Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. Elements of a formal debate. Related research topic ideas. It has been said of the debate that " nothing is a greater waste of time ." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not consist just in searching for happiness, no matter how much we spiritualise it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. back to this pre-modern state of affairs. ", Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window), Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window), Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window), Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window), Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window), Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window). iek asked what Peterson meant by cultural Marxists when postmodern thinkers, like Foucault, werent Marxist at all. Last nights sold-out debate between Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek and Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson at the Sony Centre was pitched as a no-holds-barred throw down . We often need a master figure to push us out an inertia and, Im not afraid to say, that forces us to be free. The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' thank you! But, nonetheless, deeply divided. Look at Bernie Sanders program. iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript Both rejected happiness as a primary goal for individuals and societies. Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. The twentieth century left was defined by its opposition to the truth fundamental tendencies of modernity: the reign of capital with its aggressive market competition, the authoritarian bureaucratic state power. I have included my method and aims in a Note at the end of the transcript. Next point. clear these are coherent thoughts from the same thinker. As soon as jordan peterson announced he. Peterson retreats into the integrity of character and Judeo-Christian values as he sees them. For example, an example not from neo-conservatives. Below is the transcript of Zizek's introductory statement. I was surprised (and a bit disappointed) that Peterson didn't seem more The Church of England is debating if believers should stop using gendered language when talking about God. MICHAEL FEDOROVSKY 1* 1* Investigador Independiente y ensayista. They needed enemies, needed combat, because in their solitudes, they had so little to offer.. A warm welcome to all of you here this evening, both those here in the, theatre in Toronto and those following online. Peterson El debate entre Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson posmodernismo. First, a brief introductory remark. knowledgeable about communism. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. Last night, Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek debated each other at the Sony Centre in Toronto. Peterson opens with a 30-minutes speech where he criticizes the communist [16] Similarly to Winston Churchill, he concluded that "capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others". In this sense of playing with traditional values of mixing references to them with open obscenities, Trump is the ultimate post-modern president. On Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson: Nature, Culture, and the When somebody tries to convince me, in spite of all these problems, there is a light at the end of the tunnel, my instant reply is, Yes, and its another train coming towards us. Hegels motto Evil resides in the gaze which sees evil everywhere fully applies here. Zizek is particularly culpable here, for The Master and His Emissary: A Conversation with Dr. Iain McGilchrist Transcript . They seemed to believe that the academic left, whoever that might be, was some all-powerful cultural force rather than the impotent shrinking collection of irrelevances it is. This is I think now comes the problematic part for some of you maybe the problem with political correctness. [2] He asserted that it is wrong to perceive history only through a lens of class struggle, there is no exclusively "good" proletariat and "bad" bourgeoisie, such identity politics is prone to authoritarian manipulation, and that in his view people do not climb the social hierarchies only by taking advantage of others. Iran is a land of contradictions where oppression and freedom uneasily coexist. Should we then drop egalitarianism? He sees the rejections of some systemic failures of capitalism onto external The second reaction is global capitalism with a human face think about socially responsible corporate figures like Bill Gates and George Soros. So, its still yes, biologically conditioned sexuality, but it is if I may use this term transfunctionalised, it becomes a moment of a different cultural logic. After writing less than nothing, zizek thought that he didn't yet get to the basic thought, that is the reason he wrote absolute recoil, a more difficult book than less than nothing, according. We have to find some They do not have an answer to the real problems that face us: the environment and the rise of China as a successful capitalist state without democracy. The threat of ecological catastrophe, the consequence of new techno-scientific developments, especially in biogenetics, and new forms of apartheid. Modernity means that yes, we should carry the burden, but the main burden is freedom itself. Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. Zizek's conclusion is, in his words "pessimistic": we will continue to slide One hated communism. Slavoj iek on His Stubborn Attachment to Communism (Ep. 84 - BONUS)Nothing Is a Greater Waste of Time Than the Planned Debate Between It's hard not to crack up when out of time for I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Among his points was that Marx and Engels focused too much on class struggle being the primary feature of modern society while ignoring the existence of hierarchy as a fact of nature. Another summary of the Peterson/iek debate - Pharyngula And I also think this may be critical to some of you there is a problem with capitalism here for the simple reasons that its managers not because of their evil nature, but thats the logic of capitalism care to extend self-reproduction and environmental consequences are simply not part of the game. Just remember the outcry against my critique of LGBT+ ideology, and Im sure that if the leading figures were to be asked if I were fit to stand for them, they would turn in their graves even if they are still alive. is dead and he never amended his manifesto that I know of. On the Zizek-Peterson 'debate' - MediumA Debate Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek in Toronto | City JournalJordan Peterson and 'Kung Fu Panda': How Did Slavoj iek Go - Vice If you're curious, here's the timestamp for the joke. This means something, but nature I think we should never forget this is not a stable hierarchical system but full of improvisations. [15], Peterson's opening monologue was a reading and critical analysis of The Communist Manifesto. interesting because of it. Remove him from his enemies and he is a very poor example of a very old thing the type of writer whom, from Samuel Smiles Self-Help to Eckhart Tolles The Power of Now, have promised simple answers to complex problems. agreement (as well they should, adopting neither deluded far-left or far-right Equality can also mean and thats the equality I advocate creating the space for as many as possible individuals to develop their different potentials. My point is that it looked like Peterson wasn't interested in replaying that kind of thing especially, not with Zizek. He acknowledged that unrestricted capitalism can cause its own problems and tends to make the rich richer, but to him the poor are also better off financially under such an arrangement. First, a brief introductory remark. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript - DEBATGR his remarks, he starts telling a Slovenian joke, then after the first sentence How did China achieve it? And here applies the same logic to Christ himself. Once traditional authority loses its substantial power, it is not possible to return to it. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. I mean primarily so called popularly neural-link, the direct link between our brain and digital machines, and then brains among themselves. opinions), and that the debate was cordial, even mutually admirative at times. it, or in the effort to actualise our inner potentials. We are never just instruments of some higher cause. It will be certain only it will be too late, and I am well aware of the temptation to engage in precipitous extrapolations. The Hidden Argument in the Zizek/Peterson Debate, From a - Medium The truth lies outside in what we do. Marxism: Zizek/Peterson: Official Video Jordan B Peterson 6.5M subscribers Subscribe 86K 4.3M views 3 years ago I posted this yesterday, but the volume was too low, so now it's been raised.. In the 1920s many Germans experienced their situation as a confused mess. Therefore they retreat. Id like the share the debate with a hearing impaired friend. Not only are we not allowed cheap excuses for not doing our duty, duty itself should not serve as an excuse. and our already. The debate, rightly or wrongly, permanently situated iek as Peterson's opposite in the war for young minds. Peterson and Zizek Debate | PDF | Capitalism | Karl Marx - Scribd Neither can face the reality or the future. live commentary is quite funny. A debate speech format follows the below pattern. interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. should have replied to defend communism. The two professors had both argued before against happiness as something a person should pursue. The strange bronze artifact perplexed scholars for more than a century, including how it traveled so far from home. Peterson is neither a racist nor a misogynist. This Was An Interesting Debate. [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. It came right at the end of ieks opening 30-minute remarks. April 20, 2019. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers.
